
San
Marcos, Texas-based communications firm faces off against telecom giants
Grande Communications Holdings Inc. showed up six years ago with an ambitious
plan to shake up the telecom market by building a $1 billion fiber-optic network
that would let it sell bundled phone, Internet and video service across San Antonio
and Austin. But a telecom industry meltdown led San Marcos-based
Grande to scale back those ambitions. While it once said it would serve 100 percent
of those markets by the end of 2005, it now reaches just 20 percent of each. And
now, the company -- once the area's only "triple play" bundler -- finds
itself the underdog as giant AT&T Inc. and Time Warner Cable square off here
with the same mix of products. Is there room for Grande as the Alamo City
shapes up to be the telecom titans' first full-fledged battleground? Grande
CEO Roy Chestnutt thinks so -- as long as his company can outshine its much-larger
rivals on service. "We've got to create a superior customer experience,"
said Chestnutt, who took over in January after Grande's board shook up its executive
ranks. "We obviously can't out-advertise these guys, we obviously can't outspend
them. We've got to out-service them." Since taking the helm, Chestnutt has
slowed Grande's network expansion and focused on cutting customer turnover and
reaching deeper into the neighborhoods it already serves. That means giving more
consistent and responsive service, strengthening training for the company's nearly
900 employees, and working aggressively to "save" customers mulling
a switch to another provider. "It's not about getting customers, it's
about keeping them," Chestnutt said. And for the first time, Grande
-- which also serves Waco and Corpus Christi -- is aggressively marketing service
to small and midsized businesses, a market that's traditionally belonged to incumbent
phone companies such as AT&T. Though analysts said the moves make sense,
the company's larger rivals are no competitive slouches themselves. AT&T,
the nation's biggest phone company, is spending $4 billion to launch its U-verse
video service, with its San Antonio headquarters as its first market. And Time
Warner Cable, a unit of the New York-based media giant, recently signed up its
100,000th phone customer here. Meanwhile, Grande has just 137,000 customers
and has yet to turn a profit. Its $28 million capital budget this year is a little
more than half the $48.2 million it spent last year. What's more, Grande
relies on guerilla marketing via neighborhood sales calls and community event
sponsorships. Its deep-pocketed rivals' TV and billboard ads make their brands
virtually ubiquitous. "I wouldn't say it's impossible for a company
like this, but it's an uphill task," said Piyush Arora, a Frost & Sullivan
telecom analyst. "They are trying to compete against the big boys."
But Chestnutt, a former sales vice president for cellular company Nextel
before its sale to industry behemoth Sprint, said his experience at the wireless
underdog prepared him for fighting bigger, better-capitalized foes. "Nextel
never had more than 15 percent market share, but we managed to have a viable business,"
Chestnutt said. "You can do a hell of a lot with 15 percent market share."
Indeed, competitive providers like Grande can thrive with a small share of the
market, said Frank Perazzini, director of J.D. Power & Associates' telecom
group, provided they keep customers happy and buying services. As proof,
Perazzini points to RCN Corp., a Virginia-based cable and phone company with about
365,000 customers. Like Grande, RCN struggled in the wake of the telecom meltdown
-- it even filed for bankruptcy reorganization in 2004 -- but it's since built
a stable business and scored highly in J.D. Power's most recent cable customer
satisfaction survey. "You don't necessarily need millions of customers
to be successful," he said. "Even if you're a relatively small company,
if you can deliver against your service promises, you can be viable in this market."
Chestnutt said his company is ready for the challenge, having recently won an
additional $32 million in financing from Goldman Sachs. Despite its ongoing losses,
the company finished the quarter ended June 30 with $49.2 million in cash, up
from $35.1 million a year earlier. AT&T and Time Warner talking up service
bundles, Chestnutt added, shows that Grande's business plan was right all along. "People
are satisfied with the product," Chestnutt said. "The biggest complaint
we get right now is, 'When are you coming to my neighborhood?'" |